Britain Bracing for 163,000 Job Losses: The Iran War Bill Lands on Our Doormat

Well, here we are again. Another grim forecast lands on the kitchen table, and this one comes with a side order of geopolitical heartburn. The EY Item Club reckons the UK is on track to shed roughly 163,000 jobs in 2026, a tidy 0.4% trim to total employment, with the fallout from the Iran war doing much of the damage. If that sounds abstract, it isn't. It lands hardest in the places that can least afford it.

The Headline Number, and Why It Stings

163,000 jobs. That's the figure being passed around like a hot potato by economists who clearly drew the short straw this quarter. It's a national figure, but as ever with British economics, the national average is a polite fiction. Some places will barely notice. Others are about to get walloped.

South Wales is set to lose around 5,700 jobs, and the Humber another 2,800. Both regions sit near the bottom of the UK's income league table, which is a bit like asking the kid with the smallest lunch to share his sandwich. South Wales in particular has been wrestling with the slow grind of heavy industry contraction, with Tata Steel's Port Talbot operations a long-running flashpoint. Adding a regional jobs squeeze on top feels almost cruel.

The Big Cities Aren't Spared

Before anyone in the south assumes this is a problem for somewhere else, look at the city numbers. London is forecast to lose 25,000 jobs. Birmingham 12,500. Leeds 9,800. Glasgow 6,200. These aren't rounding errors. These are entire office blocks worth of P45s, spread across sectors that thought they were past the worst of the post-pandemic wobble.

The pattern tells you something. The job losses aren't being neatly contained in one industry or one corner of the country. They're spread, and that's what makes the forecast so awkward to dismiss.

Bank of England's Gloomy Mood Music

The Bank of England has been fiddling with its scenarios and doesn't much like what it sees. In its gloomier Iran-war modelling, UK unemployment could climb to 5.6%, up from the current 5.2%. That doesn't sound dramatic on paper. In human terms it's hundreds of thousands more people staring at job listings instead of payslips.

It's worth noting this is a scenario, not a forecast set in stone. But the fact the Bank is even drawing it up tells you which way the wind is blowing. And it's not a warm wind.

Why Iran, and Why Now?

The link between a conflict thousands of miles away and a redundancy notice in Hull isn't always obvious, but it's real enough. War in the Middle East spooks energy markets, props up oil prices, and feeds inflation back into a UK economy that was finally starting to look semi-cheerful. Higher costs squeeze businesses, businesses trim staff, and the dominoes do their thing.

NIESR has also been busy revising its growth forecasts downwards, citing much the same combination of conflict and stubborn inflation. When multiple forecasters start singing the same gloomy tune, it's usually time to pay attention rather than change the channel.

The Cost-of-Living Squeeze, Regional Edition

One of the more uncomfortable findings in the EY Item Club report, though this figure is sourced to the report itself rather than independently verified, is that households in Newcastle, Belfast and Birmingham reportedly spend up to 13% of their disposable income on energy and food. In London, that figure is said to be under 9%.

Take that with appropriate caution, but the underlying point is hard to argue with. The places facing the biggest job losses are also the places where every extra penny on the gas bill bites the deepest. It's a regional double-whammy, and it doesn't take an economist to see why that's a problem.

The Bright Spots, Such as They Are

It's not unrelenting misery. Cambridge is tipped to actually see employment growth in 2026, presumably because anything that vaguely involves a research grant and a hoodie seems immune to the wider gloom. Belfast and Edinburgh are forecast to get off relatively lightly, with limited losses rather than the full hammering.

So the picture isn't uniformly grim. It's just lopsided in a way that maps uncomfortably onto Britain's existing geographic inequalities. The places that need a break aren't getting one.

What's the Government Saying?

The official line, predictably, leans on the positive. A Government spokesperson points to 332,000 more people in work than a year ago, and notes unemployment fell below 5% earlier in 2026, though those figures haven't been independently checked against the ONS in the reporting circulating this week.

There's also a reported plan to cut energy bills by up to 25% for around 10,000 manufacturers, tied to the broader clean power 2030 mission. That claim hasn't been widely verified beyond the original report, so treat it as a stated intention rather than a confirmed policy. Still, it's a recognition that energy costs are a real handbrake on industry, particularly the heavy stuff in places like South Wales and the Humber.

The Bigger Picture

A separate EY Item Club briefing has reportedly warned that up to 250,000 UK jobs could be at risk by mid-2027, with the economy flirting with a technical recession. That's the kind of stat that turns dinner-party chat distinctly chilly.

None of this is set in stone. Forecasts are educated guesses with smart graphs attached. Wars end, oil prices fall, central banks blink. But the trend across multiple forecasters is uncomfortably consistent right now, and ignoring it because it's gloomy isn't really a strategy.

The Verdict, Such as It Is

If you live in South Wales, the Humber, or any of the major cities flagged by the report, this isn't a far-off macroeconomic abstraction. It's the kind of forecast that quietly shapes hiring decisions, mortgage approvals and council budgets over the next twelve months.

The honest take? Britain's regional economy was already wobbly. Throw in an overseas conflict that yanks energy prices around, and you get exactly the kind of uneven, geographically punishing slowdown that this report describes. Whether the Government's manufacturing energy plan and clean power push can soften the blow is the question worth watching. The answer, frustratingly, won't arrive in time for anyone losing their job in 2026.

Keep an eye on the Bank of England's next set of projections, and on whether the Iran-related energy spike eases. Those two things will tell you, more than any political soundbite, whether 163,000 turns out to be the worst of it or just the warm-up.

Read the original article at source.